Безфорумни и безформени цитати.

The Terror

The development ... did not, of course, arise in accordance with the intentions of the Bolsheviks. On the contrary, it was really something, quite different from what they wanted, and they sought by all means in their power to arrest its development. But in the end they had to resort to the same recipe from which the Bolshevik regime from the very beginning had worked, i.e., to the arbitrary force of a few dictators, whom it was impossible to affect by the slightest criticism. The Regiment of Terror thus became the inevitable result of Communist methods. It is the desperate attempt to avoid the consequences of its own methods.

Among the phenomena for which Bolshevism has been responsible, Terrorism, which begins with the abolition of every form of freedom of the Press, and ends in a system of wholesale execution, is certainly the most striking and the most repellent of all. It is that which gave rise to the greatest hatred against the Bolsheviks. Yet this is really no more than their tragic fate, not their fault – in so far as it is permissible to speak of fault or blame in so enormous an historical upheaval as we are now experiencing. In any case, at bottom any fault or blame can only be a personal one.

b.m. написа:Откривам една тема, в която да се пускат цитати. Единственото условие е цитатите да не са взети от познати форуми (сещатете са за що говоря).

Логик написа:

b.m. написа:Откривам една тема, в която да се пускат цитати. Единственото условие е цитатите да не са взети от познати форуми (сещатете са за що говоря).

Предлагам цитатите да са с позоваване на първоизточника (особено когато те са от ренегати като Карл Кауцки).

Предупреждението е наложително и дано се спазва. Иначе и тая рубрика ще се превърне в блато.

Неподкупния написа:The protection of government is only due to peaceable citizens; and all citizens in the republic are republicans. The royalists, the conspirators, are strangers, or rather enemies. Is not this dreadful contest, which liberty maintains against tyranny, indivisible? Are not the internal enemies the allies of those in the exterior? The assassins who lay waste the interior; the intriguers who purchase the consciences of the delegates of the people: the traitors who sell them; the mercenary libellants paid to dishonor the cause of the people, to smother public virtue, to fan the flame of civil discord, and bring about a political counter revolution by means of a moral one; all these men, are they less culpable or less dangerous than the tyrants whom they serve?

b.m. написа:Хайде още един практик, впрочем и той като последователя си е практик от всяка гледна точка

La protection sociale n’est due qu’aux citoyens paisibles : il n’y a de citoyens dans la République que les républicains. Les royalistes, les conspirateurs ne sont, pour elle, que des étrangers, ou plutôt des ennemis. Cette guerre terrible que soutient la liberté contre la tyrannie, n’est-elle pas indivisible ? les ennemis du dedans ne sont-ils pas les alliés des ennemis du dehors ? les assassins qui déchirent la patrie dans l’intérieur ; les intrigans qui achètent les consciences des mandataires du peuple ; les traîtres qui les vendent ; les libellistes mercenaires soudoyés pour déshonorer la cause du peuple, pour tuer la vertu publique, pour attiser le feu des discordes civile, et pour préparer la contre-révolution politique par la contre-révolution morale ; tous ces gens-là sont-ils moins coupables ou moins dangereux que les tyrans qu’ils servent ?

Любопитно е, че и двамата велики теоретици на комунистическия терор стават жертва на собствената си теория, и то по приблизително еднакъв начин - с удари по главата (макар и на различно място)

Admin написа:В рамките на своята философия, според която най-голямата любезност е тази, промоцираща знанието, а не тази, запазваща го в чекмеджето с цел оказване на любезности ...

Admin написа:Вземи, човече, и спретни една програма "Форумен Еразмус" .

nikiforov написа:40% не са лош процент - виж как се разбърза

Homan написа:Къде да се запиша?